Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 1dfb2311 authored by W. Spencer Smith's avatar W. Spencer Smith
Browse files

Updates for mathematical review lecture

parent be55deee
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
No preview for this file type
......@@ -68,16 +68,15 @@
\bi
\item SRS grades on Avenue
\item If follow feedback, final doc grades will be higher
\item GitHub issues for colleagues
\item GitHub issues for colleagues for MG+MIS
\bi
\item Assigned 1 colleague (see \texttt{Repos.xlsx} in repo)
\item Provide at least 3 issues on their MG
\item Grading as before
\item Due by Thursday, Nov 8, 11:59 pm
\item Due within 2 days of being assigned the review issue
\ei
\item MG marking scheme in Avenue
\item MIS marking scheme in Avenue
\item Updated MIS template in CAS 741 repo (soon)
\ei
\end{frame}
......@@ -109,8 +108,7 @@ Final Documentation & Week 14 & Dec 9\\
~\newline
\begin{tabular}{l l l}
MG + MIS Syntax Present & Week 9 & Week of Nov 4\\
MIS Semantics Present & Week 11 & Week of Nov 18\\
\textbf{MIS Semantics Present} & Week 11 & Week of Nov 18\\
Unit VnV or Impl.\ Present & Week 12/13 & Week of Nov 28\\
\end {tabular}
......@@ -129,7 +127,7 @@ Unit VnV or Impl.\ Present & Week 12/13 & Week of Nov 28\\
\frametitle{Administrative Details: Presentation Schedule}
\bi
\item MIS Syntax + Semantics Present
\item \textbf{MIS Syntax + Semantics Present}
\bi
\item Monday: Zhi, Peter, \emph{Sasha}
\item Thursday: Sharon, Ao, ?
......@@ -158,42 +156,42 @@ Room for more volunteers. :-)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}
% \begin{frame}
\frametitle{SRS Feedback: Relationships Between Parts}
% \frametitle{SRS Feedback: Relationships Between Parts}
\begin{figure}[H]
\includegraphics[scale=0.59]{../Figures/RelationsBetweenTM_GD_IM_DD_A.pdf}
\end{figure}
% \begin{figure}[H]
% \includegraphics[scale=0.59]{../Figures/RelationsBetweenTM_GD_IM_DD_A.pdf}
% \end{figure}
\end{frame}
% \end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}
% \begin{frame}
\frametitle{SRS Feedback}
% \frametitle{SRS Feedback}
\begin{itemize}
\item \texttt{*.DS\_Store} should be in \texttt{.gitignore}
\item \LaTeX{} and formatting rules
\begin{itemize}
\item Variables are italic, everything else not, includes subscripts (link to
document)
\bi
\item \href{https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/pdf/typefaces.pdf}{Conventions}
\item Watch out for implied multiplication
\ei
\item Use BibTeX
\item Use cross-referencing
\end{itemize}
\item Grammar and writing rules
\begin{itemize}
\item Acronyms expanded on first usage (not just in table of acronyms)
\item ``In order to'' should be ``to''
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
% \begin{itemize}
% \item \texttt{*.DS\_Store} should be in \texttt{.gitignore}
% \item \LaTeX{} and formatting rules
% \begin{itemize}
% \item Variables are italic, everything else not, includes subscripts (link to
% document)
% \bi
% \item \href{https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/pdf/typefaces.pdf}{Conventions}
% \item Watch out for implied multiplication
% \ei
% \item Use BibTeX
% \item Use cross-referencing
% \end{itemize}
% \item Grammar and writing rules
% \begin{itemize}
% \item Acronyms expanded on first usage (not just in table of acronyms)
% \item ``In order to'' should be ``to''
% \end{itemize}
% \end{itemize}
% \end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
......@@ -202,19 +200,19 @@ Room for more volunteers. :-)
\frametitle{SRS Feedback on Applying Template}
\begin{itemize}
\item Difference between physical and software constraints
\item Properties of a correct solution means \emph{additional} properties, not
a restating of the requirements (may be ``not applicable'' for your problem).
If you have a table of output constraints, then these are properties of a
correct solution.
% \item Difference between physical and software constraints
% \item Properties of a correct solution means \emph{additional} properties, not
% a restating of the requirements (may be ``not applicable'' for your problem).
% If you have a table of output constraints, then these are properties of a
% correct solution.
\item Assumptions have to be invoked somewhere
\item ``Referenced by'' implies that there is an explicit reference
\item Think of traceability matrix, list of assumption invokations and list of
reference by fields as automatically generatable
\item If you say the format of the output (plot, table etc), then your
requirement could be more abstract
\item For families the notion of binding time should be introduced
\item Think of families as a library, not as a single program
% \item Think of traceability matrix, list of assumption invocations and list of
% reference by fields as automatically generatable
% \item If you say the format of the output (plot, table etc), then your
% requirement could be more abstract
% \item For families the notion of binding time should be introduced
% \item Think of families as a library, not as a single program
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment