Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
C
cas741
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
W. Spencer Smith
cas741
Commits
213df8b3
Commit
213df8b3
authored
4 years ago
by
W. Spencer Smith
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Updates to course outline
parent
effa10df
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
CourseOutline/CAS741_Outline.pdf
+0
-0
0 additions, 0 deletions
CourseOutline/CAS741_Outline.pdf
CourseOutline/CAS741_Outline.tex
+52
-29
52 additions, 29 deletions
CourseOutline/CAS741_Outline.tex
with
52 additions
and
29 deletions
CourseOutline/CAS741_Outline.pdf
+
0
−
0
View file @
213df8b3
No preview for this file type
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
CourseOutline/CAS741_Outline.tex
+
52
−
29
View file @
213df8b3
...
...
@@ -141,61 +141,90 @@ collaborator) for their work. The GitHub server is located at
\url
{
https://github.com/
}
. Students will be expected to use GitHub to provide
comments on the work of other students in the class.
\subsection*
{
Classes
}
Classes will be held virtually using Microsoft Teams.
\section
{
Course Project
}
At the beginning of the term each student will select a scientific computing
problem. Over the course of the term software will be developed to address the
selected problem. The software development process will follow the iterative
waterfall model
, with the following mileston
es:
waterfall model
. Typically, students will use one of two methodologi
es:
\begin{enumerate}
\item
``Traditional/Manual Approach''
\begin
{
enumerate
}
\item
Software Requirements Specification (SRS)
\item
Module Guide (MG)
\item
Module Interface Specification (MIS)
\item
Implementation (any appropriate programming language)
\item
Verification and Validation (VnV) Plan (divided between system and unit documents)
\item
Verification and Validation (VnV) Report (divided between system and unit documents)
\item
Verification and Validation (VnV) Plan
\item
Verification and Validation (VnV) Report
\end{enumerate}
\item
``Drasil (artifact+code generation)/Automated Approach''
\begin
{
enumerate
}
\item
Software Requirements Specification (SRS) draft, as for manual
\item
SRS generation in Drasil
\item
Code generation (Drasil supported programming languages)
\item
Verification and Validation (VnV) Plan (manually produced)
\item
Verification and Validation (VnV) Report (manually produced)
\end{enumerate}
\end
{
enumerate
}
If a student opts for the Drasil approach, they can later switch back to the
Traditional approach, without any grade related penalty.
The Drasil approach uses the Drasil tool
(
\url
{
https://github.com/JacquesCarette/Drasil
}
) to generate the SRS and the
code. Since Drasil is incomplete, the V
\&
V documents will still be generated
manually. Further details on Drasil will be covered during the class lectures.
With approval from the instructor, the deliverables can potentially be modified,
if a project is more suited to a different structure. For instance, a project
could replace one of the above deliverables with an assurance case deliverable,
or with domain specific code to automatically build the deliverables.
or with a greater emphasis on domain specific code to automatically build the
deliverables.
\section
{
Course Structure
}
The format of the course will consist of student and instructor presentations.
Each student will be expected to do an informal presentation on some subset of their SRS, MG,
MIS, Implementation, VnV Plan and VnV Report. It is expected the class discussion will
assist in improving the quality of the written deliverables. Each student will
be expected to hand in the following written documents: SRS, MG, MIS, VnV Plan,
VnV Report, code and Final Documentation.
Each student will be expected to do an informal presentation on some subset of
their SRS, MG, MIS, Drasil, Implementation, VnV Plan and VnV Report. It is
expected the class discussion will assist in improving the quality of the
written deliverables. Each student following the traditional approach will be
expected to virtually hand in the following written documents: SRS, MG, MIS, VnV
Plan, VnV Report, code and Final Documentation. The deliverables for the Drasil
approach are the same, except that the MG and MIS are replaced with the Drasil
code to generate the documentation and code.
\section
{
Grading
}
\begin
{
enumerate
}
\item
Presentations and class discussion 5
\%
\item
(Traditional and Drasil)
Presentations and class discussion 5
\%
\item
``Domain Expert'' and secondary reviewer roles 10
\%
\item
(Traditional and Drasil)
``Domain Expert'' and secondary reviewer roles 10
\%
\item
Problem Statement 0
\%
\item
(Traditional and Drasil)
Problem Statement 0
\%
\item
System Requirements Specification (SRS) 15
\%
\item
(Traditional and Drasil)
System Requirements Specification (SRS)
Document
15
\%
\item
System Verification and Validation (VnV-Syst) Plan 15
\%
\item
(Traditional and Drasil)
System Verification and Validation (VnV-Syst) Plan 15
\%
\item
Module Guide and Module Interface Specification (MG and MIS) 15
\%
\item
(Traditional)
Module Guide and Module Interface Specification (MG and MIS) 15
\%
\item
Final Documentation 40
\%
\item
(Drasil) Drasil code and Code Explanation Document 15
\%
\item
(Traditional and Drasil) Final Documentation 40
\%
\begin{enumerate}
\item
Problem Statement (Revised)
\item
SRS (Revised)
\item
System VnV Plan (Revised)
\item
MG (Revised)
\item
MIS (Revised)
\item
(Traditional) MG (Revised)
\item
(Traditional) MIS (Revised)
\item
(Drasil) Drasil code and explanation (Revised)
\item
Unit VnV Plan
\item
Code
\item
System VnV Report
...
...
@@ -203,23 +232,17 @@ VnV Report, code and Final Documentation.
\item
Reflection Report
\end{enumerate}
\item
Drasil simple physics example, pull request accepted 5
\%
(Bonus)
\end
{
enumerate
}
Each student will be assigned as a ``Domain Expert'' (DE) for one of their
classmates. The DE will review (via GitHub issues) their assigned project. In
addition, they will write the code for one of the modules of their assigned
project and issue a pull request through GitHub. For the secondary reviewer
classmates. The DE will review (via GitHub issues) their assigned project.
% In
% addition, they will write the code for one of the modules of their assigned
% project and issue a pull request through GitHub.
For the secondary reviewer
role, the instructor will assign various review tasks throughout the term. The
secondary reviewers feedback will focus more on the structure and format of the
documentation, rather than on issues related to domain knowledge.
The potential bonus marks involve creating a simple physics example in Drasil
(
\url
{
https://github.com/JacquesCarette/Drasil
}
). Drasil represents recent
(still incomplete) work to automate many of the tasks that are currently done
manually for design and documenting SC software.
\section
{
Policy Statements
}
This section of the course outline explains the course policy with respect to
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment